Refine results
... by Price Range, Classification and more
* Prices marked with a star don't include delivery costs. Please check on merchant's site.
Reviews 1 - 5 of 24
-
-
-
July 2009
Review summary of Samsung CLP-300
By alaTest
Review summary: alaTest has collected and analyzed 623 reviews of Samsung CLP-300 from international magazines and websites.
Verdict: The average review rating is 6.35/10. Comparing these reviews to 198782 other Printers reviews gives this product an overall alaScore™ 85/100 (or 8.5 out of 10) = Very Good Quality.
Read Full Review
-
-
-
October 2007
Samsung CLP-300N
By M. David Stone
Review summary: The Samsung CLP-300N's is notable for its small size and light weight, but alas, not for its performance.
Pros: Small size. Light weight. Low price. Network connector.
Cons: Slow. Subpar output quality. Poor paper handling with surprisingly low paper capacity.
Verdict: The Samsung CLP-300N color laser is impressively small and light, and it has a network connector, but it suffers from slow speed and poor output quality.
Read Full Review
-
-
-
July 2007
Samsung CLP-300N
By PC World Staff (PC World)
Pros: Price, easy to use, compact
Cons: Consumables costs are high, print quality is not impressive
Verdict: If space is at a premium in your office and you aren't too concerned about print quality or page costs, the Samsung CLP-300N makes an easy-to-use, no-nonsense color printer.
Read Full Review
-
-
-
May 2007
Samsung CLP-300N
Review summary: The Samsung CLP-300N is only slightly larger than many an inkjet printer. Yet it still comes with a full compliment of features. It offers an effective 2400 x 600dpi, just like the big boys in its class, and sports a healthy 32MB of memory
Pros: Very small and easy to use, Ethernet port, Reasonably economical to run
Cons: Paper tray smaller than most
Verdict: It's small but full of a surprising amount of goodness
Read Full Review
-
-
-
April 2007
Samsung CLP-300N
By Paul Jasper
Review summary: This tiny color laser is a cinch to use, but its print quality is disappointing.PCWorld.ca Rating: 78 Good
Read Full Review