HP PhotoSmart D7360 - Expert Reviews

Review summary: An excellent printer that's worth the money

Verdict: Of the three printers reviewed here, HP's Photosmart D7360 is the most expensive, but delivers outstanding performance and some unique features.

Pros: Fast text prints ; low-cost text and photo printing ; large touch-screen LCD is very responsive and easy to navigate ; individual ink tanks mean less waste ; dedicated 4x6 photo tray ; built-in memory card slots and PictBridge port ; ability to print ...

Cons: Slow 4x6 photo prints ; limited photo-enhancement options when printing PC-free ; can't sort or print photos by date or range of dates ; can't print bordered photos when printing without a PC

Verdict: Track pricing and other product info.

Review summary: The HP Photosmart D7360 photo inkjet printer offers some decent features for photo hobbyists--including some we haven't seen before--but it also lacks some basic features that would be useful. For $200, you get a solid-quality printer that's fast with ...

Verdict: The HP Photosmart D7360 offers a varied selection of features, great print quality, and fast text prints, but if you need fast photo prints, look elsewhere. Otherwise, this is a decent option for amateur photo hobbyists.

Review summary: The Photosmart D7630's image quality won't dazzle you, but printing photos has never been easier.

Pros: 3.4-inch color touchscreen, Easy to use

Cons: Skin tones looked too bronzed, Text output was a little light

Review summary: With a simple tap of the touch screen on HP's Photosmart D7360, you can print color photos in a snap. Insert your camera's media card in one of its reader's four slots, and the on-screen wizard will walk you through the printing steps.

Pros: Huge 3.4-inch color screen ; Easy to use

Cons: Photo quality could be better ; Text looks more gray than black

Verdict: At a street price of $200, the D7360 is exceptionally easy to use and has the best software bundle in the business. But its image quality is merely good, and plain-paper printing is clearly not its strong point