No results were found for your search query.
Reviews 1 - 5 of 106
-
-
-
October 2009
Review summary of Dell UltraSharp 07WFP Series Monitors (20",24",27",30")
By alaTest
Review summary: alaTest has collected and analyzed 1074 reviews of Dell UltraSharp 07WFP Series Monitors (20",24",27",30") from international magazines and websites.
Verdict: The average review rating is 8.4/10. Comparing these reviews to 90381 other Monitors reviews gives this product an overall alaScore™ 94/100 (or 9.4 out of 10) = Excellent Quality.
Read Full Review
-
-
-
February 2008
Dell UltraSharp 3007WFP-HC
By Neil Bennett
Pros: Great ergonomics.
Cons: Expensive considering performance.
Verdict: As Digital Arts went to press, Dell announced a replacement for the 3007WFP-HC called the UltraSharp 3008WFP, featuring a larger colour gamut, a 3000:1 contrast ratio, and HDMI and DisplayPort sockets for HD players and camcorders. Its UK availability ...
Read Full Review
-
-
-
January 2008
Dell UltraSharp 3007WFP-HC LCD Monitor
By Kalpana Ettenson
Review summary: Overall, text and graphics look great on this 30-inch LCD, but some colors were slightly muted in our review. Dell's UltraSharp 3007WFP-HC turned in strong scores in the text portion of the image quality tests.
Read Full Review
-
-
-
January 2008
Dell UltraSharp 2007WFP 20in flat-panel monitor
By Roy Santos
Review summary: Desirable extras can't make up for the pricey Dell UltraSharp 2007WFP's sluggish performance.
Verdict: The Dell UltraSharp 2007WFP would suit those looking for an ergonomic or multimedia display if not for its relatively underwhelming image quality, which is particularly disappointing given its high price for the category.
Read Full Review
-
-
-
December 2007
Dell UltraSharp 2007WFP 20-Inch Wide-Screen LCD Monitor
Review summary: Desirable extras can't make up for this monitor's sluggish performance.
Pros: Full physical adjustments ; Integrated USB hub
Cons: Sluggish performance ; No software for pivot mechanism
Verdict: The Dell UltraSharp 2007WFP would suit those looking for an ergonomic or multimedia display if not for its relatively underwhelming image quality, which is particularly disappointing given its high price for the category
Read Full Review